| « Smoke-Free | There's No Place Like Home » |
Nov
29
Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. What do you think?
The population is growing with an exponential rhythm and corollaries of needs ranging from food and housing to new industries are evolving. An attempt to satisfy these growing needs, inherent to a population growth, will imply much more land to expand farms, industries, grow raw materials, and build new houses. On the other side of the scales, are the endangered animals bound to suffer from such an expansion. PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF THE ESSAY
1 comment
-
§ assadjo
said on : 01/16/08 @ 14:20
Solving the animals' issue doesn't have to be on the account of people or visa versa. Food resources are abundant for each. The problem lies in the hand of the super power politicians. Instead of dedicating billions for crusades all over the globe, they can simply use the money to help find new techs to enhance agriculture and guarantee food security. One can easily notice the huge amounts of foods thrown in the garbage cans of the so called civilized world. If those people's "devouring" or eating habits change a bit, that would help reduce the burden on our ecosystem and help save animals habitat.
This post has 2 feedbacks awaiting moderation...
Comment feed for this post
Recent comments